Rwanda has been lauded as a development success and a role model for Sub-Saharan Africa, but critics suggest that this development has come at the expense of healthy democratic governance. Kagame’s Rwanda is an excellent case study for a broader question in international development: does democratic change lead to development, or does development lead to democratic change? Can you have one without the other?

Related Articles

Take a look at some of our favorite articles that we came across while researching democracy and development in Rwanda:

Want to contribute to a future episode?

" target="_blank" rel="noopener">email!

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already, you should really subscribe to our show. It’s free and you’ll have our episodes delivered to you automatically every week. You can subscribe on iTunes, SoundCloud, Stitcher, in your email, or just about any way possible outside of carrier pigeons (coming soon). In case you’re not sure how to subscribe, check out our instructions page.

About the Author
Lacey Bruske is a graduate from the George Washington University’s MA program in International Affairs. She hails from Portland, Oregon. Prior to attending GWU, she worked at the Department of Justice as an advocate for women who were victims of sex trafficking crimes and a legal assistant on drug trafficking crimes. She graduated from Utrecht University’s University College Roosevelt in Middelburg, The Netherlands with a B.A. in International Law and Foreign Relations. Her travels have taken her throughout Europe, but she hopes to broaden her scope to South America soon. Her academic interests include organized crime and trafficking of weapons, drugs and people.